Rock Products

JUN 2018

Rock Products is the aggregates industry's leading source for market analysis and technology solutions, delivering critical content focusing on aggregates-processing equipment; operational efficiencies; management best practices; comprehensive market

Issue link:

Contents of this Issue


Page 63 of 75

62 • ROCK products • June 2018 LAW control of the agency's lab or analytical contractor. Gener- ally, agency procedures for measurement and analysis are attempts to "estimate" personal exposures and compare them to regulatory exposure limits, intended to reduce risks and permit safe exposures. For example, most dust measurements generally are limited to "respirable" size (very small) dust particles (e.g. less than 10 microns) that create a long-term risk of disease through their ability to penetrate to the lower regions of the lung and not be rejected by routine breathing. The collection and analysis of "respirable" dust requires the use of an appropriate sampling cyclone, to separate air- borne dust particles into respirable and non-respirable sizes, by using a calibrated pump to control air flow through the cyclone and sampler, and deposit the respirable portion onto a small filter that can be examined, weighed and analyzed at the lab. An employer should request copies of all documents related to the samples collected at their site. Which documents should you look for? Your roadmap is each agency's tech- nical manual governing the particular sampling involved (for instance, OSHA has its Technical Manual, as well as a Chemical Sampling Information (CSI) file and Field Opera- tions Manual). The manuals describe each and every step required for agency sampling collection and analysis. Many of these steps require creating records. For example, the inspector should have records of the type cyclone used, the type and model number of the pump and calibration equipment used, and whether "[b]ulk samples are necessary" (e.g. to check for interfering minerals). OSHA should also have "chain-of-custody" records to demonstrate the treatment of the sample throughout the process. OSHA/MSHA altered samples produced (for lab analysis ease), may not be valid samples for compliance determinations. Similarly, samples contaminated with over- sized, non-respirable particles, may not be valid proof of exposure limit violations, based on respirable dust. All of these facts and many more create variability or error in ana- lytical results that can be fatal to the validity of an agency sampling exercise. For example, the OSHA Technical Manual states that certain pumps should not be calibrated with certain calibrators due to a high error rate: "The escort elf pumps should not be cal- ibrated using the Bios International piston type calibrators because they can produce an uncertainty error of more than 4 percent (compared to the desired margin of error of ±1 percent)." ( html#appendix_II). The validity of your citation may hinge on whether the inspector did a proper calibration with the right calibrator, calibrated the pump at the same altitude before and after sampling, visually observed the sampling, and more. Each activity during the sampling and analysis process has its own error rate and adds variability. NIOSH accepted levels of variability are limited to +/-25 percent of the true value, 95 percent of the time. Weighing the filter, analyzing via x-ray diffraction, and other steps each add significant error or vari- ability to the end result. Documented OSHA/MSHA errors or accepted variability exceedances question the validity of over exposure allegations and citations. Consider these additional opportunities for error. For per- sonal air sampling, did the inspector: • Assemble filter cassettes prior to the site visit? • Mix different brands of cassette components (a no-no)? • Ensure a good seal between the filter and the cassette? • Fully charge pump batteries? •  Use the same specific type of sample media in line (e.g., filter, sorbent tube) that will be used for sampling in the field? •  Use the same media for calibration and sampling (not appropriate)? •  Calibrate sampling pumps at the same temperature and pressure (altitude) as the field sampling location? •  Accurately and completely create sampling pump cali- bration records and field sampling notes using the OIS air sampling worksheet? •  Take photographs and/or videos (as appropriate) and detailed notes? •  Take ventilation and/or smoke tube measurements as helpful to assess engineering controls? • Observe whether the employee wore the sampling equip- ment properly and whether or not the employees sampled were performing their normal duties at the time? •  Identify and document: what facility processes/operations were being run during sampling, what tasks the employee normally performed and how this shift was different, what materials employees were exposed to, and what were the normal work practices and deviations during that shift, what exposure controls were in place and how effective they were? • Conduct representative full-shift sampling (in the case of exposure limits that are 8-hour time-weighted averages)? All of these factors have been observed in past OSHA inspec- tion results as issues related to issued citations. It should be noted that these issues are only some of the many factors impacting accuracy and validity of IH sampling. But, sam- pling is only part of the agency challenge to measure your compliance. As we will examine in an upcoming article, lab procedures are equally exacting and complicated, setting a high standard for the government to meet. Moreover, your own sampling and analysis results or that of your insurer or consultant may produce evidence that the agency may try to obtain and use to support their enforcement efforts. These issues also will be addressed as part of our planned series of articles aimed at providing tools for employers in meeting anticipated increas- ing agency enforcement efforts.

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Rock Products - JUN 2018